Reading the below article (however it may insult you) will help you understand my post today.
BNP: Islamic Colonisation via the Cradle: 7,576 Mohammeds versus 8,007 Jacks
Ok so, reading the article, it does sound a bit like there were a lot of babies with variations of the name "Mohammed" born in the UK in 2008. From this we can infer that at least 7,576 babies were boys and Muslims in their religious beliefs. This is logical, fair enough.
Let's just put this in proportion.
700,000+ babies were born in the UK in 2008. With simple maths, we can learn that just over 1% of babies were called Mohammed. Now, if we factor in that not all Muslim babies are called "Mohammad", and that about 50% will be female - even with that factored in, I can't really see more than 4% absolute tops of babies being Muslim (remember, only about 3% of the population is Muslim). Even then, it's a tiny number - and by no means proper colonisation (apart from the fact the BNP has misunderstood the term colonisation, look it up in a dictionary, are Muslims setting up their own towns?).
It's completely hypocritical for the BNP, therefore Englishmen and women, to take insult at us being "colonised" by foreigners who happen to be of a different religion. We used to be in control of the largest empire in the world, at its height we controlled 25% of the land, including a massive chunk of the middle east (and thus a huge amount of land that muslims lived in). So, to be frank - we shouldn't be complaining.
Now, apart from the above, intersting to note that the BNP focussed on the Muslim religious name, and didn't mention any other large numbers of foreign names.
Fucking racists.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment